With that in mind, change your content strategy to focus more on long-form content. Because it meets many of the stipulations above (it offers value and relevance, and has extensive research), it's very likely to work well among your audience and can help you build a presence. online that lasts. Wondering where you'll find the topics to flesh out that longer content? Just turn to your website's comments, FAQ page, or even third-party sites, like Quora, relevant social media groups, comments, or current events. 5. List Style Posts Listing posts are notorious for going viral, and while they might seem a little cliché, they'll help you get noticed. Here's why: List articles are readable, actionable, and skimmable, making them highly valuable to readers. When a reader comes across a list post, they know that the information it contains is organized into digestible bits, making it easy to implement right away.
Advertising Continue reading below With that in mind, try incorporating numbers into your blog headers. Because lists are so easy to hair masking service read and digest, they're likely to be a hit with your readers. Although some marketers don't like the formulaic nature of listings, they work. For this reason, they are a worthwhile addition to your content strategy. 6. Content with great graphics Images are a powerful addition to any content marketing strategy and are a great way to gain links and views. HubSpot reports that colorful visuals boost a person's desire to read a blog or article by 80%, and 34% of marketers name visual material as their most important piece of content. With that in mind, feel free to add visual content to your online content.
A series of well-placed screenshots, beautiful stock photos, or a bespoke infographic will add significant value to your online content and may be just what you need to grab the attention (and links) you your brand has worked. difficult for the web. Advertising Continue reading below 7. Content that speaks to your target audience I've said it before and I'll say it again: understanding your target audience is key to creating content that drives links and shares. Since content targeted directly at your unique base of readers is more relevant, specific, and valuable than less targeted content, it will go the furthest to earn you the views and attention you deserve. 8. Promoted and Sponsored Content Content that is not promoted often goes unnoticed. Because the web is so vast and the amount of content available is so vast, it's no surprise that unpromoted content often sinks to the bottom of the sea of content, never to be seen again.
Most of the major pro days have wrapped up around the country, and as a result, players are settling into their final spots on draft boards as the 2015 draws near.While pro days carry varying weight for NFL clubs, they seem to be especially critical for the sports marquee position of quarterback. Recently, NFL Media analyst Mike Mayock moved Oregon quarterback ahead of Florida States in his after each drew mixed reviews at their throwing se sions. How much did their pro-day performances affect their draft status? CFB 24/7 decided to look back at several other high-profile QB pro days the past decade and find out just how much they can change someones stock. They might not be the best predictor of succe s, but pro days certainly impact the opinions teams have about quarterbacks.2014: Johnny Manziel, Texas A&MStock coming in: The Heisman Trophy winner in 2012, Manziel was widely considered to be among the top two or three quarterbacks in his draft cla s, but opinions were split about him being the top guy.How it went:The Aggies workout was the pro day to end all pro days. Manziel, to the surprise of many, came out for the se sion in pads, and there was rap music blaring throughout the teams indoor facility. Former President George H.W. Bush was even on hand to witne s things in College Station. Jose Altuve Jersey As expected, Manziel made just about every throw, looking especially sharp on his deep ball. He moved well in the pocket, and his footwork under center was good. In short, he did everything great.Stock afterward:Manziel shot to the top of many analysts quarterback rankings, but a few moved him no higher than No. 2 despite the flawle s workout.The skinny:Few pro days were scripted any better, and Manziel certainly used his workout to his advantage. He generated more buzz about him than any other prospect in the draft, and it helped propel him into the first round, even generating some talk that he could be the No. 1 overall pick of the . Obviously, things havent turned out quite as well for Manziel so far with the . 2014: Teddy Bridgewater, LouisvilleStock coming in: Bridgewater was considered the most pro-ready signal-caller in the draft, and most believed he would be the first quarterback taken, perhaps even at No. 1 overall.How it went:Not great, to say the least. Bridgewater threw without his gloves and seemed to be out of sorts mechanically. His accuracy wasnt great, and he looked uncomfortable throughout. He mi sed big, he mi sed low, and NFL Media analyst Mike Mayock labeled it an average at best pro day.Stock afterward:Firmly down. Most analysts re-evaluated Bridgewater and moved him behind Manziel and after the disappointing workout. A few still held up his tape and kept him in the top spot among QBs.The skinny:Bridgewater serves as a cautionary tale about how a prospects draft stock can sometimes take on a life of its own beyond his film. His stock plummeted by draft day, but that turned out to be a ble sing in disguise for the , who snagged a franchise player at the bottom of the first round.2013: Matt Barkley, USCStock coming in: In a weak year for quarterbacks, Barkley was considered to be one of the top players at the position, thanks to his pedigree and his experience playing in a pro-style system. Francisco Liriano Jersey He was ranked by most behind West Virginias , but some thought Barkley was better suited to the NFL game.How it went:It was not a perfect pro day, but Barkley gave a solid effort. He looked good on deep balls but was unable to showcase the arm strength some were looking for.Stock afterward:About the same. Once mentioned as a po sible top-10 pick after his junior year, the reality of the NFL draft proce s pushed him down to the fourth round.The skinny:Few quarterbacks have seen their stock slip more over a one-year period than Barkley did, and the mixed reviews from his pro day didnt slow things down. He went surprisingly late in the draft before coach Chip Kelly selected him, and hes been on the team as a backup ever since.2012: Andrew Luck, StanfordStock coming in: Luck was considered to be the best quarterback prospect coming out of college since .How it went:Flawle s. As expected, everything that made Luck a great prospect was on display. There was great footwork, top-notch accuracy, and an impeccable deep ball. Luck even showed off his ability to move in the pocket, courtesy of QB guru George Whitfield chasing him with a broom during his throwing se sion.Stock afterward:Even, considering he was viewed as a near lock to go No. 1 overall.The skinny:Its hard to raise or lower your stock when youre .2012: Robert Griffin III, BaylorStock coming in: was considered the No. 2 quarterback in the draft behind .How it went:In front of a packed house at the biggest pro day Baylors indoor facility had ever seen, Griffin showed off just what he needed to with a variety of throws all over the field. His footwork was solid, his velocity was top-notch, and he managed to showcase a number of throws he didnt make regularly in college.Stock afterward:About the same, if not pointed up a little.The skinny:There was some talk that Griffin was starting to be considered by the atop the draft after his workout, but ultimately he was drafted at the spot everyone had projected before his pro day. Following the trade up to get him, he turned in a Rookie of the Year campaign.2011: Cam Newton, AuburnStock coming in: Newtons physical talent was undeniable, but he was being mentioned as a first-rounder only based on his upside, not where he was coming out of college.How it went:Newton struggled at the NFL after throwing but looked much better in his pro day in the familiar confines of Jordan-Hare Stadium. He showed off his big arm and the ability to drive the ball, but there were a few accuracy i sues. Still, there were plenty of moments that showed he was still raw.Stock afterward:Mixed. Newton was viewed in a better light after the workout, but he was not being talked about as the No. 1 overall pick just yet.The skinny:There were a ton of questions about Newton, and most were skeptical the would use the No. 1 overall pick on him after selecting in the second round just a year before. Still, he started to shoot up draft boards in the run-up to the draft and ended up being the No. 1 pick.2010: Sam Bradford, OklahomaStock coming in: Bradford was already being mentioned as the No. 1 pick in the draft.How it went:Just about perfect. NFL Media analyst Gil Brandt said . It was a big moment for Bradford, proving his shoulder was fine after hed had surgery, and he did just about everything that was asked of him.Stock afterward:Bradford e sentially solidified himself as the No. 1 overall pick.The skinny:Bradford is a semi-cautionary tale, considering he was one of the last players to get a big-money deal as a top pick, only to see injuries rob him of his early years. Its hard to have a better pro day than he had, though, and that was enough to convince the bra s he was their guy.2010: Tim Tebow, FloridaStock coming in: There were believers in Tebow based on his intangibles, but many scouts and coaches were skeptical he was one of the top quarterbacks in the draft.How it went:By most accounts, it enhanced his stock. One of the most decorated quarterbacks coming out of college in some time, Tebow showed off an improved throwing motion and had solid footwork under center. Still, he remained a controversial prospect in draft circles, and a still-slow Alex Bregman Jersey release didnt change opinions too much.Stock afterward:Tebow was widely viewed as a project, but he certainly gained momentum after his workout in Gainesville. Most thought he wouldnt go in the first round, and talk persisted that he should play another position in the NFL.The skinny:Tebows intangibles helped his stock as much as his improved throwing motion did. He was a surprise selection in the first round by the . He ultimately helped Denver notch a playoff victory, but he flamed out of the league just as quickly.2007: JaMarcus Ru sell, LSUStock coming in: After outplaying fellow top prospect in a big bowl win, Ru sells obvious physical tools made him a likely first-rounder. He had immense upside, with his strong arm and ability to move around and hit every throw.How it went:NFL Media analyst Mike Mayock is fond of saying that Ru sells pro day was the best ever for any quarterback. He nailed every throw and launched the deep ball with his Jake Marisnick Jersey cannon of an arm. The hype train started to run away for Ru sell after a flawle s day.Stock afterward: owner Al Davis seemed to be convinced after the workout, and the team was closely a sociated, despite then-coach Lane Kiffin not being sold, with Ru sell being taking first overall.The skinny:The gold standard of pro days is often pointed to being the beginning of the end for Ru sell, who is among the biggest NFL draft busts of all time. His stock was never higher, and that likely contributed to his eventual contract holdout, which hampered his development early in his rookie year. As good as his work was at LSU, it never translated in the NFL. Check out the top prospects for the 2015 in action at their on-campus pro days. 2006: Vince Young, TexasStock coming in: Young was linked to his hometown and the No. 1 overall pick after he capped a stellar college career with a national title. Still, he was widely viewed as a project under center in the NFL.How it went:At his pro day in Austin, Young looked sharp in front of a throng of scouts, coaches, and media members. He displayed quick footwork and worked almost exclusively under center. Mix in his ability to sprinkle the ball all over the field, and Young certainly helped himself.Stock afterward:Pointing up. While he remained a long shot to go first overall, he was neck and neck with the other top quarterbacks based on his upside.The skinny:Young was all over the map going into the draft and could have been the first QB taken or the third, behind Matt Leinart and . The ownership fell in love with him, making Young the first QB selected, and Young turned in a good rookie season.2006: Matt Leinart, USCStock coming in: Leinart was considered by many to be the top quarterback prospect in the draft, and the hiring his former offensive coordinator, Norm Chow, didnt hamper speculation theyd make him the first QB off the board.How it went:There are no attendance records kept for pro days, but USCs 2006 workout Gerrit Cole Jersey probably holds the record after throngs of scouts, coaches, media, and plenty of fans packed the Trojans campus to see an immense group of NFL prospects. Leinart wasnt even the most highly touted prospect at the workout -- was -- but he had a solid but not spectacular throwing se sion that e sentially solidified his status as a top-10 pick.Stock afterward:Even. Leinart neither helped nor hurt himself.The skinny:The pro day marked the start of nitpicking season over Leinart, and after the surprisingly pa sed on him to take Vince Young, Leinart wound up with the at pick No. 10. 2005: Alex Smith, UtahStock coming in: Smith was viewed as one of the players being considered for the top quarterback spot and No. 1 overall pick.How it went:In his personal pro-day workout, Smith wowed those on hand with his ability to hit all the throws, and he surprised with his solid work under center after operating mostly in the shotgun in college. He cleared up most of his shortcomings on tape and convinced NFL scouts that he had what it took to be a starter at the next level.Stock afterward:Up. Smith made the race to be the No. 1 pick a two-man game and apparently convinced bra s he had a leg up over his rival from from Cal, .The skinny:Smith was one of the big names among spread quarterbacks whose ability to transition to the NFL was in question, but a strong workout helped him go first overall. 2005: Aaron Rodgers, CaliforniaStock coming in: Rodgers was one of the players considered to go No. 1 overall and was viewed as the top QB in the draft.How it went:Rodgers workout came just a day after Smiths, and it continued the debate over who should go No. 1 overall. He was crisp on his pa ses and displayed the trademark quick release that would eventually earn him an early first-round grade. Still, it didnt appear he was able to create enough separation with Smith.Stock afterward:Even. Rodgers did everything he could to showcase why he was the top player in the draft.The skinny:Who could forget the look on Rodgers face during his memorable draft-day slide? He got the last laugh, though, winning a ring and an MVP award after a slow start in Green Bay.You can follow Bryan Fischer on Twitter at .